ANLCA blames government over collection of PAD by shipping companies

Prince Olayiwola Shittu, National President, Association of Nigeria Licensed Customs Agents (ANLCA).

By Gboyega Oni

Nigerian ports are said to be the most costly ports in the West and Central African subregion of the continent. Shipping and terminal operators at will increase or add to the long list of charges with or without a recourse to both government or importers/customs agents.

A new case of additional charge is the Port Additional Destination (PAD) that was recently introduced by shipping companies who are operating in the country’s maritime industry.

The introduction of the new charge – PAD – was said to have caught many major stakeholders particularly customs agents unaware. According to information, they were never informed or briefed before the shipping companies came up with the PAD. PAD, however, has increased the cost of cargo clearance on the side of shipping companies.

Notable among the shipping companies that are said to have commence the collection of PAD is CMA CGM.

While reacting to the new charge, Mr. Pius Ujubuonu, Senior Special Assistant to the National President of Association of Nigeria Licensed Customs Agents (ANLCA), Prince Olayiwola Shittu, said shipping companies cannot at will introduce or initiate new charges contrary to the international practice of document charges and without consulting the government.

He noted that PAD with other contentious charges like Shipping Line Agency Charge (SLAC), which he said its collection had been stopped in Ghana, cleaning charge and others have jarked up the cost of transacting cargo in the ports.

He said for shipping companies to initiate PAD and commenced collection and no government agency – Nigerian Shippers Council, a port regulator, querying its legality or otherwise meant that government had given them approval to do so.

“Government is the cause of the problems in the industry. Shipping companies could not just wake up and introduce a new charge without the consent of the government or its agency – the Nigerian Shippers Council,” he lamented.

On the position of ANLCA on the new charge, Ujubuonu said that ANLCA was never consulted, noting that the association as a pressure group that should deal with this situation would not be embarking on a move that would be to alleviate the plight of customs agents while other associations would thwart it.
He said the multiplicity of associations in the industry and failure of the government to recognise ANLCA as a major stakeholder like the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN) and others in its policy making have made it difficult for ANLCA to confront such a challenge as this.

Ujubuonu informed that the leadership of the association are working vogorously to earn recognition for the association on the side of the government, adding that ANLCA would leverage on the exploits of its members who are in political positions in the country, to reposition and prepare it for a greater leadership role in the nation’s economy particularly in the maritime industry.

 

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*